Authors
Another Writer Goes Digital
A Long time ago, I predicted that the digital publishing revolution would not simply be a playground for amateur writers. That, more and more, the pedigreed, professionally published writers would slowly begin defecting from the ranks of the traditional publishing realm and begin taking control of their own destinies. That’s the promise of digital: 24/7 publishing on-demand at the ready, and in multiple formats that you can do yourself with no help from agents or establishment editors or marketing pros. And so, I read with great interest Brit author, Ray Connolly’s saga of how he became the latest writer to jump on the bandwagon:
I’m now Ray Connolly, writer, editor-in-chief and head of marketing of Plumray Books, and any one of the 2 billion computer-owning people in the world who wants to read my new novel, The Sandman, can do so at the click of a mouse. It’s being serialised chapter by chapter on my website where, over the next 10 weeks, it will build like a part-work. In the words of a friend, I’m "doing a Dickens".
What’s more, it’s free – although should any readers want to find out how the The Sandman ends before October, and hopefully quite a few will, they can download the entire book for less than the cost of a paperback. After that it will go on to Amazon.
With one digital bound, I’ve become an entrepreneur.
For as long as there has been an Internet, there has been this great divide between writers who published online because they had no other option and writers who had agents and publishing deals, who scoffed at self-publishers. Writers who looked down their noses at anyone who didn’t run with the herd, extolling the virtues of their publishers as if loose diamonds fell from their open mouths. But, it’s clear what’s happened in the meantime, just as Connolly articulates:
You won’t hear it said in many publishing houses these days, where those editors and managements who have survived the 10% cull in their numbers following the credit crunch now appear frozen in the headlights of the onrushing digital revolution. But from the point of view of authors, these are potentially exciting times.
Because, although advances have been slashed, and literary agents are wringing their hands at the difficulties in finding publishers for all but the most guaranteed fiction, change is on the way. With Apple’s iPad recently joining Amazon’s Kindle and the Sony Reader as devices for reading downloaded books, power in publishing might just be shifting in the authors’ favour.
That is it in a nutshell. Writers want and need to get their work out there to be read, and they’d like fair access to the market and a fair chance to eek out a living from it. Publishers simply provide less service than they use to. It’s not so much that editors don’t edit anymore, so much as it is that editors don’t have as much power or autonomy anymore. Too much of the decision-making is being done by the bean-counters and bottom-liners. Only a small number of writers continue to benefit from the current system. The vast majority of writers have to be more self-reliant than ever before to get exposure. With no more diamonds to be had, the choice is between self=preservation and loyalty to a system that no longer provides much sustenance.
Don’t Cry for Me, Garrison Keillor
Humorist/Media Personality, Garrison Keillor, has a piece in The Baltimore Sun, that demands a response. See, ole Garrison has joined a long list of big name writers, who’s finally realized that new media isn’t some joke or some fad that’s going to disappear — he’s realized that the old media publishing world that brought him to fame is on the verge of extinction and he doesn’t like it.
He’s as entitled as the next guy to his opinion, I suppose. I just wish he could add something new to the discussion. The old media good/new media bad argument doesn’t really hold that much weight, really. Yes, there’s a lot of self-published material out there that is of very low quality. Sure. But how does that negate the reality that there’s some good stuff that comes self-published. And what about blogging? The blogosphere is made up almost entirely of the self-published? You guys reading this blog, you think all blogs are bad just because the blog writer hasn’t been anointed by the New York Times or HarperCollins? Also, am I missing something, Garrison Keillor? Since when did texting and tweeting, or making wall posts on Facebook count as writing? Since when is my niece, who sends hundreds of texts every day a writer because she uses this technology? New Media doesn’t really change the writer’s job description. There’s still plenty of room for tortured geniuses — or at least crackpots who think they’re geniuses. And there’s plenty of room for the housewife who blogs about babies and wedding accessories too.
Writing wasn’t invented by your generation of writers, Mr… Keillor, nor was publishing invented by your "old media". Writers will write, will struggle to write, and write some more now and for as long as people exist and have at least a few functioning brain cells. So, you go on and cry for you own damn self and what you think the new media is costing you. Don’t cry for me. I’m okay. I’m going to be just fine. And so will the rest of the writers out there.
Lit Fun #5: Vanity
I shampoo with a vitamin-enriching hair growth shampoo that neither enriches nor grows hair. It’s just my own personal vanity that I even try to have a head of hair like I had in my 20’s. Today, I gave up and shaved my head completely bald. I usually do this at the end of June and again just before the beginning of Autumn.
As I brought that electric razor down along my scalp, I thought about vanity as a literary device. Almost every writer that I know of deals with human vanity in one form or another in their writing. Shakespeare (pretty much everything he wrote), Oscar Wilde (The Picture of Dorian Gray), Jane Austen (Persuasion, Pride and Prejudice), Dostoevsky (The Idiot), Thackerey (Vanity Fair), Harry Crews (Body, The Mulching of America), etc. Countless literary works written throughout the ages. Our own vanity is very fertile ground for conflict, humor and characterization for creative writers.
